- An initial concept outline is drafted internally and distributed to participating partners for early-stage evaluation. - Each contributor examines the proposal from their operational viewpoint and submits structured feedback to highlight concerns or opportunities. - Returned comments are consolidated, and a revised version is issued, capturing clarified requirements and unresolved questions. - A technical review group assesses compatibility with existing systems, documents integration constraints, and produces a reference summary for all teams. - A risk-focused team analyzes compliance, operational exposure, and potential failure points, flagging items that require redesign. - Financial reviewers estimate projected cost and request refinement when expected effort exceeds target thresholds. - After several rounds of refinement, contributors reconfirm their sections to ensure alignment. - Once approved, the specification is recorded as the active baseline in the central archive. - A recurring review cycle updates the baseline whenever new findings surface, ensuring ongoing accuracy throughout the initiative. - **The process concludes here with the finalized specification accepted and stored as the authoritative reference.**